Chicago Fire 0-0 Atlanta United: Staff, community player ratings

Atlanta United midfielder Bartosz Slisz #6 dribbles during the second half of the match against Chicago Fire FC at Soldier Field in Chicago, IL on Saturday April 27, 2024. (Photo by Griffin Quinn/Atlanta United)

In the Andrew Gutman Derby, Atlanta United slogged to a goalless draw vs. the Chicago Fire. It was a disappointing result in a match where United were expected to pick up 3 points, so let’s review it with our staff and community player ratings.

GK: Brad Guzan – 6

The Fire had no shots on target and hit the crossbar on a quick shot Guzan could only come out to and make himself big. He moved the ball around well and didn’t really have to do much of anything. Solid.

LB: Caleb Wiley – 5

Wiley was poor in this match defensively. Not only was he constantly bullied off the ball by Chicago’s frontline, his tacking was not efficient. On offense, his passing was so-so. It’s a night to forget for the youngster.

CB: Luis Abram – 6

Abram is sometimes hard to watch, but he did his job well in the match, clearing the ball when needed and moving it well when building out from the back. I do wish he’d check his shoulder more often, though, as when Chicago hit the bar, their player flew right behind his back. Otherwise, it was a solid night.

CB: Efrain Morales – 6

This may be seen as a low rating by many, but I wasn’t particularly impressed by Morales in his first pro appearance for the club. I don’t hate Efrain at all; I loved his performances in the preseason and thought we should call him up before Noah Cobb (that was wrong). But while he wasn’t bad by any means against the Fire, he didn’t stand out, either. After a shaky first 15 minutes when it came to positioning and the timing of his tackles, Morales was solid and nothing more, just like Abram. And honestly, that’s all you can ask of him, so props to him for a good first start.

RB: Brooks Lennon – 5

This was Lennon’s worst performance of the year. It wasn’t bad, but it was lackluster, as his crosses into the box never seemed to find feet and went into empty space, excluding the one ball to Saba that was miraculously saved in the first half. He just couldn’t make a huge difference in the match, which is a shame.

CDM: Bartosz Slisz – 7 (Man of the Match)

Slisz was United’s most consistent performer tonight and the Man of the Match for the 2nd week in a row. His passing was great, as he was one of the only players to consistently switch play, and his defending was fantastic. However, what was most impressive was his positioning. He settled on the 18 and shut down the Fire on defense, but on offense he stayed just behind Muyumba and combined well with him, Almada, and the wingers in the opponent’s final third. This change from usually lining up level with Muyumba really helped the team to attack and has been needed for weeks. Slisz is doing his job well at the moment for Atlanta when others aren’t and is looking to be a good signing.

CM: Tristan Muyumba – 6

Not a bad performance by Muyumba, as he was constantly in the attack (almost scored after two step-overs, plus a shot hit just wide) and moving the ball. However, he failed to make as big of an impact as usual and there’s real reason that can be pinpointed as to why; he just didn’t. His passing was so-so, but that didn’t really affect play to a great extent, so Muyumba just wasn’t at his best.

CAM: Thiago Almada – 7

Almada had a game that was a tale of two halves. In the first half, with the exception of a long pass to Giakoumakis that led to the goal called back for offside, his passing was extremely innacurate. In the second half, Almada’s passes were pinpoint and should have led to goals if not for the excellent saves of Fire goalkeeper Chris Brady. Almada became a workhorse dribbling through the midfield and was best when combining out wide at the corner of the 18 yard box with a winger like Wolff or Mosquera setting up crossing opportunities. He did his job, but the players up front just couldn’t deliver.

LW: Tyler Wolff – 6

Many fans online wanted Wolff to be subbed off after his first half, but I saw a different player today than what I usually see. Wolff was technical with the ball at his feet and confident playing under pressure. His combination play with Almada was good, as well. Were some passes off? Yes. Did he miss chances to play other players in? Yes. And while he still struggles to have confidence while driving at players, at least he tried it! I saw new hope for a young player who’s struggled to make an impact for Atlanta United this year. He continues to develop and has great potential as a facilitator out wide and a goal scoring presence through the smart runs he makes into space (he scored the goal that was called offside). He’s not there yet, but he needs to keep trying.

RW: Saba Lobjanidze – 6

Saba just didn’t get the ball enough today, plain and simple. There were plenty of attempts to switch play to him or cross it to him when he was unmarked in the box, but Atlanta never did. Ironically, Atlanta only started to play on the right side of the field when Saba moved to the left and Mosquera became the right winger.

When Saba received the ball, he whipped in good crosses and should have scored if not for the brilliance of a Chris Brady diving save to his right in the first half. Saba’s header was as perfect as you could head it and was bound for the net before the save. A solid performance with missed opportunities for the Georgian international.

CF: Giorgos Giakoumakis – 5

The Tank was poor in his first start since injury. While his work rate on defense was admirable, as he was making tackles where the midfield should have been, his first touch was heavy and ruined one of the biggest parts in his game: his hold-up play. He wasn’t expected to torch the Fire but to only light a flame, yet the flame never had a spark – a moment – to light it.

Subs:

CM: Dax McCarthy – N/A

Was in the game for a while, but didn’t add much significance and didn’t receive the ball enough for a full rating.

CF: Daniel Rios – N/A

Same as McCarthy, Rios rarely received the ball, but he had a header late in the match somehow stopped by Chris Brady.

RW: Edwin Mosquera – 7

Mosquera is an enigma, an on and off player that seems to be best at lighting a spark off the bench. He didn’t do that by driving at players like he usually does. Instead, he combined very well with Almada and others, setting up crosses rather than trying them himself, a bit like Wolff’s role in the first 60 minutes. I was impressed after a rough last few weeks for the winger.

Coach:

Gonzalo Pineda – 4

You have to beat the Chicago Fire and gain all three points, especially when you only gained 11 points from your first 8 games. While Pineda can be excused from opposing goalkeeper excellence, his general tactics were awful. His team rarely switched play enough and had two awful setups building out of the back (which will be explained in detail in a future article): one with a stagnant, level midfield dropped deep and one with a lonely No. 6, that led to giveaways way too often. He continues to struggle to teach his team how to play out of the opposing press out wide. Finally, the energy on the pitch was lethargic, as Pineda again failed to bring out a team with passion and quick play in the first half and beyond. Atlanta’s coach continues to field a different team on the road than at home and brings bad tactical changes on the road trip. When they don’t work out, he refuses to change anything, which may soon cost him his job if the results continue as they are now.

Now, here are your community player ratings for the match:

Brad Guzan: 6.32

Brooks Lennon: 5.64

Efrain Morales: 7.25

Luis Abram: 6.29

Caleb Wiley: 5.79

Bartosz Slisz: 7.29 (Man of the Match)

Tristan Muyumba: 6.18

Thiago Almada: 6.07

Saba Lobjandize: 6.39

Tyler Wolff: 4.43

Giorgos Giakoumakis: 5.29

Daniel Rios (Sub): 5.85

Edwin Mosquera (Sub): 5.15

Dax McCarty (Sub): 6.41

Gonzalo Pineda: 3.46

5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

22 Comments
WestCoastATLien

The goalposts are whatever you as a fan want them to be.

theoriginalzontar

It’s been obvious to me since 2020 that the goal is “Just make the playoffs and hope for the best there”. I know that’s not what fans want to hear though. The “top 4 stuff” is coming form writers and fans. I don’t recall any front office person ever saying that.

There hasn’t been any accountability at any level of the org since Pineda was hired. I love MLS and soccer so that’s why I watch the matches, but I’m not expecting any MLS Cup runs or any trophies any more.

The article you read has what the MLS website writers expect for the team. Most reams don’t go public with their own actual expectations.

Gatorsnake

Pretty sure hosting a game first round was set as a goal prior to the changes to the playoff format. At the time that goal was set that meant top 4. So it is not from nowhere.

JosefBetterThanCarlos

My prediction preseason was 3rd. I think that is still a fair goal, but we’ve wasted so many of the easiest points of the season that assuming we sell Almada in the summer my expectations are dropping to 5th

Rychek4

Team looked 100% more dangerous with Dax McCarty than the entire game to that point without him.

Gatorsnake

100 times zero is zero?

WestCoastATLien

I get that in other games, Fortune seems like the logical defensive sub, but Dax’s ability to move the ball along in the late stages of the game really stuck out to me.

It reminded me of Parky’s right place right time instincts.

Last edited 2 years ago by WestCoastATLien
Robpar

Don’t like Fortune, just like I never liked Chol. No ball handling “touch”

JosefBetterThanCarlos

Top 4 in the East = home playoff series, right? Or did I forget something?

JosefBetterThanCarlos

Oh yeah. I just thought of “host a home series” as “be the team who gets 2/3 home matches”

Gatorsnake

Pretty sure there was an interview with Garth end of last season where he acknowledged the team fell just short of their goals. But he cut Pineda some slack because the roster was still in transition. This year the pieces were supposed to be there. No more excuses. Garth seems very pragmatic so I’m not sure about a mid season move, but if we are out of the top 4 I would wager they do not renew Pinedas contract.

gravityshack

it’s incredibly frustrating to me to see saba continually starved for service. he is on an island for 1/2 of every match while we beat our heads against a wall down the left side. rarely does someone (wiley, muyumba, slisz, almada…) pick their head up and take a look across the field.

saba thrives in those isolated spots. one v one down the flank, cutting in, putting defenders on a swivel. and yet we miss at least a 1/2 dozen opportunities every match by ignoring him.

you can see the dude get frustrated, and even start pinching in more and more to try to get involved. then when he finally does get on the ball, he (many times) tries to make more happen than might actually be there…which you can understand but isn’t the best recipe for success.

i wish i could say this was a recent development, but it’s been happening for most of year. and after the novel approach by pineda last week to “intensely study film” (slowly shake my head), you would think they would have noticed a guy on film in a 9 jersey standing around by himself screaming for the ball.

Smortz

By my tally, Almada:

45 passes complete (of which 7 were unproductive passes that arguably worsened the team’s shape or were kind or aimless)
7 turnovers on the ball
14 turnover passes (to or intercepted by an opposing player)
5 passes that left the player in an awkward, marked position resulting in an immediate turnover
1 off target shot
1 on target shot
6 defensive ball pressure
1 tackle
3 decent corners
1 crappy corner

Not all bad. Some of the passes were excellent. He typically does show flashes and he did look better in the second half.

But not ideal for his role imo…too inconsistent.

And those stats don’t even call out his biggest weakness which is he’s often moving into weird spaces off the ball that worsen angles or draw defenders towards the ball or moving defenders around in a counterproductive way when he’s on the ball. A lot of that comes down to vision.

Not at all intended to diss the kid. Just plenty of room for improvement to be a consistent, integral ball handler. My hunch is that if/when he gets a European deal, he’ll be in a different role.

robpar

I posted only positive observations on another thread. Tired of being negative on GP’s coaching. Let’s give him some hope ; )

JosefBetterThanCarlos

Been there, done that.

But hey, I appreciate someone being positive. I’m just out of excuses to make for him.

TioMessi

Funny, because I’ve been the “let’s give him some hope” guy for 2 years and decided last week I’ve had enough. Sorry, but it’s gonna be negatives going forward for me unless he turns things around and 1) we start winning some GD away games for once and 2) he figures out how to stop making pewter out of a roster made of gold. It’s just inexcusable to drop points at home from a leading position and to fail to take 3 points away from road games against garbage teams (especially ones missing their most important, non-garbage player like Shaqiri).

Last edited 2 years ago by TioMessi
robpar

I hear ya. My wife doesn’t want to go to any more games, but I think I’ll still be going; at least for a few more…and hope….

augoat

I’ve been critical of Pineda for most of the past two years. I entered this year with kind of a clean-slate mentality and let’s see what an offseason with a pretty much “complete” roster can do…but sitting 9th in the EC (8th in ppg) after a quarter of the season isn’t where I expected this team to be. Even with the injuries here and there, we’ve seemed to fill those gaps with solid to good players in most cases, and we’ve also faced a number of teams also missing some key guys.

My realistic hope is that one of two things happens over the next month. One, is we find some spark and start winning games (home and away) and climb the standings. Two, if we don’t do that, Pineda is let go in June. Summer window would be a good time to go coach shopping.

theoriginalzontar

Our 2 mid-season firings happened specifically because both managers lost the locker room. The reasons they lost it were different, but both FdB and Heinze lost it and there was really no path forward but to change managers. It is extremely unlikely that Pineda will lose the locker room. The players really like him a lot. He is a players manager. I’m sure Pineda will stay to the end of the year. If he fails to make the playoffs, he probably gets fired. Remember – Boca needs a scapegoat if things go south. But as I have said before, I am positive the org’s goal is to simply make the playoffs and the Five Stripes can do that. If they make the playoffs, I expect Pineda to return.

Jampantz

Yeah, spot on…almost zero chance GP is fired midseason. They’ll wait to eval the end result. If we get past round 1, he’s almost defn renewed, with terms varying based on how deep they go.

gravityshack

the org’s goal is to simply make the playoffs

probably correct…and that speaks volumes about how expectations around this club have fallen

augoat

The flip side of that coin is that the only two coaches to effectively be fired by the team were let go mid-season. Both coaches were let go on the back of poor performances on the field. FdB wasn’t let go only because of the locker room issues. If that were the case, he’d have been fired a year earlier. Heinze painted the himself and the FO into a corner as he was not following league guidelines around practice, AND the on-field performances were awful. He also directly clashed with Josef at a time where Josef still had power with the club (turns out, maybe Josef was as much of the issue as Heinze).

We will see come June/July how serious Lagerway and the club are now about the stated goal of finishing in the top half of the playoff seeds. If we are still floundering around mid-table this summer and no move is made, I’ll assume they are just happy making the post-season most years and that was all bullshit.

22
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x