No, that’s not a clickbait title. Okay, maybe a little clickbaity. Anyway, I’m about to tell you that I see Alexey Miranchuk as more of an eight – maybe even a six. Sound outrageous? Just read on for a bit and keep an open mind.
First, let me address the question of why I would even consider moving a $13 million designated player away from his primary position. Well, because quite frankly he’s underperforming. Severely underperforming. From much of the dialogue around Atlanta’s attacking players coming from the club’s front office staff, the entire attack was meant to revolve around Miranchuk’s skillset as a through ball artist to play pacey forwards in behind. I think President and CEO Garth Lagerwey said it best in this quote where he used the other kind of football as a metaphor:
“We got our quarterback in Alexey Miranchuk … but we know we need to get some wide receivers, we need to get some left tackles, we need to get some defensive ends, some of these high-priced guys that come in and can really, really help the team, impact the team, and win games for us,” he said.
Fast forward to the present. Atlanta United has brought back club legend Miguel Almiron from Newcastle and once again smashed the MLS transfer record to sign striker Emmanuel Latte Lath from Middlesbrough: two players who are incredibly fast and – together with Saba Lobjanidze – form a very dangerous attacking trio on paper. It was all coming together for Atlanta United to really, truly be back… until they started playing.
The team is now five games into the 2025 season with a 1-2-2 record and a mere six goals – certainly not the rate Atlanta paid nearly $50 million for. However, something very alarming is that Miranchuk – the player who is supposed to be the most creative on the field – has zero goal contributions. ZERO. Every other member of the front four has some sort of goal contribution, but Miranchuk has nothing through five games.
Every week, Scarves and Spikes brings you original interviews, on-site coverage, live shows/podcasts, and the analysis you won’t find at the bigger national outlets. With 2026 being a World Cup year, Atlanta United facing yet another important transfer window, the U.S. Soccer National Training Center setting up shop in the Atlanta area, and NWSL Atlanta kicking off in 2028, your support helps us do even more.
What you get on Patreon:
- Atlanta United training ground updates
- Discord access — talk Atlanta soccer with the SnS team and other supporters
- Patreon-only mailbags
- Grey Gowder’s analytical deep-dives on roster construction, the academy, ATL UTD 2, and more
Start your free trial
In an article I recently wrote, I analyzed some of the tactical issues that were contributing to the scoring struggles, and in that article, I included a brief section about Atlanta figuring out its No. 10 spot. In Miguel Almiron, the team has a player who could fill that role and be much more creative than Miranchuk has been. I think, for the sake of the team’s attack, he needs to take that role.
So now the question is what to do with Miranchuk? Do you bench him? Maybe… or maybe you find a different place on the field for him. Well, you could have him switch with Miggy and go to the right wing, but he definitely doesn’t have the pace to attack space in the final third. Besides, I think after seeing that Cincinnati game I want to see more of Saba Lobjanidze on the right, where he has looked way more dangerous than he has in four previous games on the left.
But you know where he could fit well? Playing as a deep-lying playmaker at the No. 6.
Proof of Concept
This idea didn’t come to me in a dream, by the way. We actually saw Miranchuk at the No. 6 after Atlanta was forced to replace midfielder Tristan Muyumba following a knee injury in the first half against FC Cincinnati. Interestingly, rather than making the like-for-like switch with midfielder Mateusz Klich, Ronny Deila opted to sub on striker Cayman Togashi, shifting to a 4-4-2 with Miranchuk and Will Reilly in a double pivot.
It wasn’t perfect, but we did get some interesting long balls.
And some dynamic switches of play.
And he had a couple of good actions in defense. Here he is tracking an opposing midfielder before intelligently intercepting a pass.
Mind you, this is a guy who has NEVER in his professional career played as a defensive or central midfielder. The long-range passing can certainly be a valuable asset to this team in moments where it wants to try to break forward quickly. His ability to switch the play can also be useful in Deila’s system where switches of play are a point of emphasis.
Interesting Stats
Funny enough, the underlying numbers actually suggest that Miranchuk might be doing better than most believe (I know, I was shocked too).
He ranks 8th among MLS attacking midfielders in goals added among players who have played at least 300 minutes with 1.04. If you’re not familiar with goals added, it’s a metric that looks at how each of a player’s touches impacts their team’s chances of scoring or conceding a goal. It does this by separating each touch into six categories: shooting, receiving, passing, dribbling, interrupting and fouling.
However, Miranchuk’s goals added from passes (0.07) is very low compared to elite No. 10s around the league such as Seattle’s Albert Rusnak (0.54), Colorado’s Djordje Mihailovic (0.50) and Dallas’ Lucho Acosta (0.44). So which categories are holding him up? There are three: receiving (0.65), shooting (0.34) and interrupting (0.25). What does this mean? Well, in a broad sense, it means that a lot of the value that Miranchuk is currently providing to the team has more to do with his positioning/runs to receive the ball, his above-average ability to take shots with high expected goal values (and have them on target or hit the frame of the goal) and his defensive actions.
Yes, I just said that the attacking midfielder is statistically providing more value with his defensive actions than his passing. Why? Because he mostly tries (often unsuccessfully) to find Atlanta’s front three with his progressive passes. It’s not necessarily that his passes are bad, just that he isn’t as effective at getting them the ball in positions where they can be most dangerous.
Alright, now let’s look at a few more specific stats that reinforce the idea of him thriving at the eight or the six after five games:
- Accurate long balls: 9 (85th percentile)
- Chances created: 9 (86th percentile)
- Tackles won: 5 (89th percentile)
- Tackles won %: 83.3% (82th percentile)
- Blocks: 5 (92nd percentile)
- Recoveries: 26 (95th percentile)
So Miranchuk has some of the statistical markers that imply he could be successful in that deeper role and his physicality can certainly help on defense.
Now let’s look at the numbers for Miranchuk’s most likely replacement at the No. 10 should he be moved to a deeper role.
Miguel Almiron with Atlanta United in 2025 after four games
Goals Added Overall: 1.37 (4th among MLS wingers)
Goals Added from Passes: 0.27 (4th among MLS wingers)
Goals Added from Shots: 0.27 (10th among MLS wingers)
Goals Added from Dribbling: 0.24 (3rd among MLS wingers)
Chances created: 5 (62nd percentile)
Dribble Success: 64.7% (85th percentile)
Expected Assists: 0.74 (70th percentile)
Bear in mind that Almiron has played one game less than Miranchuk and he has this level of production from a mostly wide position, not to mention the primary assist and secondary assist he has provided so far. Almiron is no stranger to the No. 10 position, having played that role during Atlanta’s 2017 and 2018 seasons. His performance in that 2018 championship year had him leading the league in goals added with 15.00 overall and 1.38 goals added from passes.
Just for fun, here are some of his per 90 stats from that year compared to now:
| 2018 | Per 90 stats | 2025 |
| 3.97 | Shots | 2.02 |
| 0.31 | Assists | 0.25 |
| 2.25 | Chances Created | 1.26 |
| 54.4% | Dribble Success | 64.7% |
So he’s just a touch behind those numbers right now from a different position and the eye test certainly shows he has the potential to get back to them or close to them.
New look Atlanta United?
If Miranchuk were pushed back into that deep role, here is how I would envision Atlanta United’s starting XI:
With Almiron shifting into the No. 10, Saba can switch over to the right side where he seems to be more effective. Xande Silva takes over on the left as the only viable left winger given Edwin Mosquera’s injury. In midfield, Bartosz Slisz remains the more defensive midfielder alongside Miranchuk, who will be responsible for helping move the ball forward.
In possession, I would expect the team to set up wide with the wingers as potential targets for Miranchuk to find with long switches. With Almiron in front of him finding spaces from which he can receive the ball, Miranchuk can also find him in primary assist zones. From there, the Paraguayan can do the rest.
Out of possession, the team will probably look very similar to how it normally sets up:
The team presses in a 4-4-2 with Almiron, now the attacking midfielder, pushing up as a second striker to press alongside Latte Lath. The wingers, Silva and Saba, drop back to form the midfield four and press the opposing fullbacks when the time is right. If the team is successful in forcing a turnover, Almiron can easily shift into the role of playmaker from which he can find the rest of Atlanta’s attacking pieces.
Maybe this helps unlock Atlanta’s struggling attack, maybe it doesn’t. In any case, the Five Stripes may have to try changing something if things don’t turn around soon. If Deila liked what he saw from Miranchuk in that deeper position, he may ask him to hold it down there for the foreseeable future to see if these shifts help the team really start cooking.

[…] Newcastle United for years – and Miranchuk as the 10. Then, he tried (very briefly) deploying Miggy at the 10 with Miranchuk in a deeper No. 6 role. Miggy also played a game as a second striker next to Emmanuel Latte Lath with Miranchuk as a […]
[…] these positions gave him more space to ping long balls out wide and support build up into the final third, they also left the team more exposed due to his defensive shortcomings. He doesn’t cover […]
[…] few months back, I published an article detailing why moving Miranchuk out of the traditional No. 10 role and into a deeper midfield…. Dropping him back worked… […]
[…] *Originally Published at Scarves and Spikes. […]
[…] it on Scarves and Spikes for quite some time, and our very own Henry Higuita Jr has written two articles on the topic. And it isn’t a nostalgia thing, though that is a tasty cherry on top. It’s simply […]
[…] I want to go back over the most important changes on that day and why it could be the way for Atlanta United moving forward. Let’s start with one I discussed at great length in another article. […]
This is fantastic analysis! Ronny has to see Alexeys value at that 8/6. That last 30 or 35 minutes of nycfc he had so many touches on the ball and absolutely took over the midfield which unlocked our attackers. His one and two touch play is better than anyone else on the team(nagbe ish😉) and when he turned up field and had everyone in front of him he picked out the right passes. He used his physicality and dribbling when needed to get out of tight spots when cb’s passed him into bad situations too. Even saw him directing his team and getting them in the right spots! He came alive and the team came alive!! I was so mad watching the game live but watching it a second time it was him that took over the game. I would have been concerned about him defensively but he carried just fine. I would actually be interested in seeing him and klich in as double pivots…we would be so dangerous offensively and honestly our d cant get any worse. Williams is biggest liability right now. Gotta find some one who handles those direct balls better.
[…] It was at this moment that Deila made some much-needed tactical adjustments. Xande Silva and Matt Edwards came in to replace Klich and Chong Qui, moving Miranchuk to the No. 8 role, Almiron to the No. 10 and Saba to the right side (something I wrote about this week that you should definitely go check out). […]
I am not sure what you all see in #59..to me that was a waste of money…he is for sure not physical, he is very slow..and never tackles anyone. The coach needs to give slisz and fortune the start..but let them hold and TACKLE and breakdown the opponents attack instead of letting the ball get into our 3rd and that puts too much pressure on our defense. I would let #10 take #59 spot on the 4-4-2. and put mosquera up with LL.
“his physicality can certainly help on defense”. what?! also can’t support any starting lineup that has Xande in it.
He’s too slow to be a 10, that’s not fixable
Interesting article for sure. Well broken down, so, kudos to Henry.
I will say that I am more confident in Miranchuk on the LW than I am from what i’ve seen from Xande. Xande may be SLIGHTLY faster than Mira, but he’s too cute on the ball (remind you of someone?) and i don’t think i can recall a good shot from him this season so far. I think opposition know they don’t even need to mark our LW when he is in.
I am all about calling for Miranchuk to prove his worth and he hasnt, so far. I think we need more solid data points from the full, healthy, starting XI before we make drastic changes in the summer, but I don’t see why we cant play around with him at the 8 while muyumba is recovering. Deila has had his hands full with call-ups and injuries so i’m interested to see what he does at this point.
I could not watch the game Saturday live, so I watched it late Sunday after reading a lot if the criticism. The delay provides a very interesting perspective.
The most relevant to this article is Miranchuk’s performance. Honestly, it was a very strong performance and is undeserved of the criticism. I would qualify myself as “undetermined” when it comes to judging his value to the club so far, but this was not one of the performances that should push you into the overvalued category. He moved the ball well, took several dangerous shots, did not lose the ball often, and was even decent defensively.
A few other random observations, I was expecting Reilly to have played out of his socks and was left a bit underwhelmed. Solid game, but certainly not a performance that leaps him ahead of Fortune, Klich, Muyumba, or Slisz. I still like the kid, but am holding off before believing that he needs substantially more playing time.
Edwards was criticized but had a very solid game. Even the foul was not egregious. If he does not make that foul, then Evander has a clear shot that likely finds itself in the back of the net. I don’t fault him at all. I think it just compounds the frustration built from past mistakes.
Overall, the team completely dominated the first 60 minutes away to a top team in the East. While a 20 minute span in the 2nd half leaves a sour taste in your mouth, you have to expect the home team to gain some momentum playing at home a certain points in the match, especially one with as much quality as Cincinnati. Having said that, it is clear that we have the quality to compete at the top of the East.
I normally watch these games live and allow my emotion to heavily influence my perspective following the match, so this was interesting to read the post game emotionally laced comments but have the opportunity to watch the game without the stresses associated with a live match. Just figured I would share.
Great insight. After all live matches at the benz, I always rewatch later on tv. And I often watch the away matches twice as well, so I know what you are saying. It’s definitely a different perspective and you pick up a lot of nuance often missed only watching live. I have hypothesized that the initial reactions are usually not as bad nor as good as how the actual match played out.
I am still high on this team, even though frustrated with the end results so far.
Strong disagree on the Matt Edwards foul for two reasons.
1. If he was close to winning the ball, I could be more aligned with your thinking. Perhaps I need to rewatch the highlights, but I dont recall he was close, and therefore shouldnt have left his feet.
2. Not making the foul may have led to a shot on goal. But I think that’s quite the revisionist statement to suggest the play was “likely ending up in the back of the net.” “Likely” is doing a lot of heavy lifting there, in my opinion.
I’m certainly open to argue whether the rest of the game was an improvement for him. And I’d be inclined to say that other than the foul, it was.
However, bigger picture, I cant help but be unsatisfied with the lack of roster turnover this offseason. I can appreciate Garth wanting to have a high bar for incoming players, so long as we don’t put ourselves too far behind the 8-ball, which is a real possibility if we dont get hot, fast. Many commenters here saw fullback as an area of concern to start the year. I would feel a lot more confident in turning the corner had we signed a veteran RB good enough to have allowed us to salvage 3-5 more points so far.
[…] Is Alexey Miranchuk secretly Atlanta United’s Nagbe replacement? […]
Good article. Just very concerned, like many here, with his lack of defense. We would only have one truly defensive midfielder and we would get run over by many teams. Watching the Italian league, seems to me their game is so much slower with very little quick transition play. They are for the most part more defensive minded and the ball moves cautiously; not in MLS. Maybe that’s Miranchuk’s issue, don’t know but something has to change.
Wait just a darn minute. When Miranchuk was signed, Garth said “we are BACK, baby”! So all should be fine.
The thing is, Miranchuk is a LWfor Russia, and we know Saba is better on the right anyway. Just throw Saba on the right and Miranchuk on the left and give it a shot
I think you’re on to something.
Not that I disagree with the logic, but with that logic, Almiron plays on the wing for Paraguay, so we should keep Almiron in the wing as well
Almiron will do well in either spot though. It seems like Saba and Alexey do substantially better in their other spots though.
I like the idea, but I would be worried about our defensive solidity. I’m thinking two possibilities:
Option 1: 4-3-3 (with dual “8s” and a single 6)
Silva – Lath – Saba
Almiron – Slisz – Miranchuk
Amador – Williams – Gregersen – Lennon
This is basically what you have, except Almiron and Miranchuk share responsibilities box to box rather than having one behind the other. I think for this to really work though, We need to replace Slisz with a true destroyer 6, more along the lines of Big Red, Carmona, etc.
Option 2: Some variation of 3 at the back – for now 3-4-3, even though I’m still scarred by our poor performance with it in previous years.
Silva – Lath – Saba
Amador – Almiron – Miranchuk – Lennon
Williams – Gregersen – Cobb
This would help fix the lack of defense in the previous option by essentially having your destroyer 6 just be a CB to begin with. You risk Almiron and Miranchuk becoming outnumbered and rendered ineffective though unless you make sure everyone around them, particularly Silva & Saba, help contribute to the midfield presence.
I love this idea but I do have a few concerns:
Overall, I think that this is a good idea and should be seriously considered by Diela. Who knows. Maybe Diela is a Scarves and Spikes fan!
RE #1. I fear we are overvaluing Klich based on his current contract. His contract says he is a DP, but I think his value for us more closely aligns with what we are paying, not the entirety of what DC and ATL are paying.
In other words, I think he still holds a lot of value as a very experienced depth piece/spot starter that would realistically get plenty of time, but thats a very different kind of role than “indispensable DP 6”.
The “what do we do with Miranchuk” debate goes above my paygrade, but I’m not convinced Miranchuk is in any way a downgrade from Klich at the 6 and he potentially has more upside, particularly if we get to a point where teams try to bunker against us.
YES! It’s like this article was written as a direct download from my thought process. I’ve always seen him as a more effective 8 than a 10. Not as much a 6 though, that’s where Slisz/Klich shine (i’m starting to favor Klich at the moment due to Slisz’s horrible ball control and passing lately).
I’ve said it since the rumors started that Miggy needs to be our 10, period. He floats all around that midfield, he owns it, he finds the spots, and I think he and Miranchuk are competing for that space because he knows Miranchuk isn’t finding them.
Would love to see this play out in our next match. Try it, what can it hurt? We lose ANOTHER game or *cough* draw? Whoop de do, we’re already doing that now, what else do we have to try?
Just announced that Muyumba is out at least 3 weeks with a calf and LCL strain. Seems like now is the best time to try Miranchuk at the 8, miggy at 10, xande/saba in the wings and see how this goes.
/armchairassistantcoach
How would Klich fit into this lineup?
It would depend upon the opposition. We have so many options at the 6 and 8 position that Klich could play either Miranchuk’s role or Slisz’s in a double 8.
Slisz, Fortune, and Muyumba would all be the workhorse midfielder who plays in tandem with the metronome/quarterback of Klich, Miranchuk, and Reilly but a few of these guys could play either role.
Cool write up and I’m glad I didn’t read the clickbait-y headline and decline to take the bait (who am I kidding, I’d read an AUFC article titled “poop” written by a cat if presented to me). This all sounds pretty good honestly except that I’m not sure I like the lack of speed in that 6/8 pivot. We would really be asking a lot of the CBs to stop fast counters that start unexpectedly in our defensive half. But maybe we would see fewer of those kind of counters though if Deila can teach Muyumba to be less loose with his ball control in our own half (unless this just causes him to lose his spot) or if Chuk can feel more freedom to make quick releases than to be dispossessed.
Haha thanks. Though I’d be quite impressed if a cat managed to write any sort of article tbh 🤯
As for your concerns, I understand. I will say that I saw some good movement from Alexey when defending that caused the opposition some issues trying to progress. He helped delay their directness and that extra time was crucial in getting everyone back. I think he would more than make up for the lack of pace with some of his distribution from deep.
What is your source for these stats?
American Soccer Analysis and FotMob
Are Aleksei’s defensive percentile stats relative to other attacking mids?
Yes. All of the percentiles are relative to AMs in MLS.