Sideline Soapbox submissions don’t necessarily reflect the opinions of Scarves and Spikes staff. You can submit your own pieces here.
Written by Eric/VIPsofAtlantaSoccer
Atlanta Unitedโs recent matches show a shift toward structured, repeatable attacking sequences built around Alexey Miranchuk.
Over the past several matches, Atlanta has shifted from producing uneven attacking sequences to building more controlled and repeatable plays, with a clear central reference point shaping how possession turns into chances. The numbers show a change in where attacks end and how consistently they develop, while the matches show a team that is more organized both with and without the ball.
The sample is still small, but it spans three distinct phases, with Atlanta playing matches built around Miguel Almirรณn, matches where both were available, and matches where Miranchuk has been the primary central reference point. The question is not simply whether Miranchuk is performing well, but whether those shifts in structure point to a team that now depends on his decisions to control matches.
What changed in Atlantaโs attacking structure?
Atlantaโs control of the match against CF Montrรฉal began with where the ball consistently settled. It settled centrally at the feet of Alexey Miranchuk. Atlanta held 64.62% possession, which forced Montrรฉal into extended defensive phases. Those phases repeatedly opened the central lane between midfield and back line.
That central access allowed Miranchuk to receive facing forward rather than under immediate pressure. His role shifted from a connector into the player deciding when attacks moved forward and when they reset.
With that level of possession, Atlanta returned to him as the reference point on nearly every sequence. Teammates adjusted their runs based on his first touch and passing angle. Miranchuk completed 17 passes in the final third as the primary outlet.
Instead of reacting to the flow of play, he began to control where each phase started and how quickly it developed. Each sequence now ran through him before progressing forward. That shift from being available to being the point through which the game is organized places his role in the conversation about captaincy.
Atlanta has shown this pattern across multiple matches. The team sustains possession against different opponents without losing structure. Atlanta is not just holding the ball, but holding its shape while doing so. That structure allows attacks to develop through the same central access rather than breaking into isolated actions.
That control carries into how attacks reach their final action. When sequences build through a consistent central reference point, the shot at the end of the move comes from more predictable positions rather than from forced situations. The phases below show how those final actions differ across matches with Almirรณn, matches where both were available, and matches where Miranchuk has been the primary reference point.
| Phase | Dates | Games | xG per Shot | Avg | What it shows |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Almirรณn-dominant | 3/21 โ 4/11 | DC, CLB, CHI | 0.059, 0.244, 0.080 | 0.128 | Highly inconsistent – swings between forced shots and good chances |
| Transition | 4/18 โ 4/22 | NSH, NE | 0.064, 0.117 | 0.091 | Drops and remains unstable |
| Miranchuk-dominant | 4/25 โ 5/2 | TOR, MTL | 0.082, 0.124 | 0.103 | Narrower range – more consistent shot selection |
Earlier matches show wide swings in shot quality from one game to the next. Those attacks often reached the final third but ended in different types of attempts depending on how the sequence broke down. In recent matches, that range tightens. Fewer sequences end in low-value shots, and fewer rely on isolated high-quality chances. The final action becomes more consistent because the buildup leading into it is more controlled.
Is Possession turning into controlled attacking output?
Earlier in the season, Atlanta reached the final third regularly but did not turn those sequences into reliable chances. Many possessions ended with forced shots or attempts from poor positions. The issue was not reaching attacking areas, but how those sequences finished once they got there.
Recent matches show a different pattern. The number of attacks has not increased dramatically. More of those sequences now reach the box before the final action. That shift has made the outcomes more consistent.
| Phase | Possession % | Avg | What it shows |
|---|---|---|---|
| Almirรณn-dominant | 65.82, 55.45, 53.97 | 58.4% | High but not decisive |
| Transition | 56.25, 45.87 | 51.1% | Drops |
| Miranchuk-dominant | 48.49, 52.67 | 50.6% | Slightly lower |
Atlanta is not dominating the ball more than before. Possession has declined slightly across phases. The change comes from how those possessions are used. More sequences now move through central areas and reach the box before the shot.
| Phase | Inside Box Shot Rate | Avg | What it shows |
|---|---|---|---|
| Almirรณn-dominant | 0.556, 0.625, 0.550 | 0.577 | Decent but not improving |
| Transition | 0.417, 0.609 | 0.513 | Drops, with the Nashville match particularly low |
| Miranchuk-dominant | 0.571, 0.706 | 0.639 | Clear improvement |
More attacks are now ending inside the box rather than from distance. The ball is arriving in central areas before the final action. Players are receiving in positions that allow them to shoot with fewer defenders set in front of them. That change reflects how the buildup shapes the final phase of each sequence.
What has not changed
Shot accuracy has not improved over this stretch. Atlantaโs shots on target rate remains flat or slightly lower in recent matches. Shots are not being struck more cleanly, and attempts are not hitting the target more often.
The difference appears earlier in the sequence. More attacks now reach the box before the shot, and fewer possessions end in forced or low-value attempts. The locations of those shots have changed even if the finishing has not. That shift has made the teamโs attacking output more consistent without relying on better shooting.
Does Miranchuk control how Atlanta builds attacks?
Atlanta played through Miranchuk on nearly every possession. He positioned himself between the lines or just off the double pivot, giving the first pass out of buildup a clear direction.
When he dropped into the half-space, the double pivot played forward instead of circulating across the back line. The ball moved through him and into the next line before Montrรฉal could shift its shape.
When he stayed higher, Atlanta advanced through the wings before returning centrally. As the ball moved wide, Montrรฉalโs midfield stepped toward the ball. The return pass into Miranchuk opened the lane into the final third.
Those sequences repeated across phases of play. The ball reached him early, and the next action followed immediately from his first touch. Runs ahead of the ball began before he received, with wide players moving inside and forwards stepping off the back line.

The ball reached him as the first option out of midfield. Teammates played into him early in each sequence before advancing play into the final third.

Wide players moved as he received, starting their runs before the pass was played forward. The timing of those runs matched the moment the ball arrived centrally.
| Phase | Chance Rate | Avg | What it shows |
|---|---|---|---|
| Almirรณn-dominant | 1.0, 0.75, 1.0 | 0.917 | Erratic, with small-sample swings |
| Transition | 1.0, 0.842 | 0.921 | Still unstable |
| Miranchuk-dominant | 1.0, 0.875 | 0.938 | Slight stabilization |
More sequences now reach the final action. Fewer possessions stall in midfield or end with a forced pass. The ball moves through the same central route before the shot.
| Phase | Goals – xG | Avg | What it shows |
|---|---|---|---|
| Almirรณn-dominant | -0.528, -0.954, -1.602 | -1.028 | Consistent underperformance |
| Transition | -0.764, -1.685 | -1.225 | Still underperforming |
| Miranchuk-dominant | +1.425, +0.894 | +1.160 | Strong overperformance |
Those same sequences now finish more often. The ball reaches the final third through the same central actions, and the final pass arrives with runners already in motion. More of those moves end with a shot from inside the box and a clear path to goal.
Does his presence improve teammatesโ decisions?
When Miranchuk receives early in a sequence, the next pass follows quickly. The front line moves against a set defense, with spacing already in place across the final third.
As the ball moves through him, midfielders hold their positions instead of stepping forward at the same time. The back line stays connected behind the play, with fewer gaps opening between lines.
Possessions end in organized areas of the field. Turnovers occur with Atlantaโs shape already set, allowing the team to step forward and recover the ball instead of retreating into emergency defending.
When he slows the play, teammates hold their runs and reset around him. When he plays forward, those same runs begin immediately. The timing of each movement follows the moment the ball leaves his foot.

Midfielders adjust their decisions based on those moments. The ball moves through the same central player before advancing, and the next action follows without hesitation.
Is Miranchuk already performing captain responsibilities?
Miranchukโs influence on the ball defines how Atlanta organizes its attacks. He positions himself between lines as the central outlet, and teammates rely on him to move the ball out of pressure and into the next phase.
When he receives the ball, the next action becomes clear. He decides whether the sequence accelerates forward or resets, and the team adjusts around that decision. Runs begin, spacing holds, and the shape of the attack forms from his first touch.
That control extends across phases of play. Possessions pass through him before progressing, and the timing of each movement follows the moment he releases the ball. The teamโs structure is not fixed in advance, but built through his decisions in real time.
Since taking up the armband, Miranchuk has become more vocal with teammates. He claps them on, points out spaces, and gives directions between phases of play. He remains engaged as the next sequence begins, continuing to direct movement as play resets through him. He encourages younger players in those moments, reacting to their plays whether they succeed or make a mistake.

Martinoโs reference to leadership through play appears in those moments. The ball reaches Miranchuk early, the next action follows his decision, and the teamโs shape adjusts with each phase. Those sequences organize possession and spacing without requiring instruction away from the ball.
What changes when Miguel Almirรณn returns?
Almirรณn advances the ball by carrying it through pressure. He receives facing forward and drives into space, forcing defenders to step toward him and compress around the ball. Miranchuk advances play differently. He positions between lines and moves the ball early, drawing defenders out before the next pass breaks the line.
When both operate in central areas, those actions pull the attack in different directions. One sequence accelerates through the dribble, while the next builds through positioning and passing. The point of progression shifts depending on who receives the ball first.
Attacks lose a single reference point. Teammates adjust to one player on one sequence and another on the next, which changes the timing of runs and the shape of the attack as it develops.
For Atlanta to maintain a consistent attacking pattern, one player must become the primary outlet. Sequences then build through that player, whether through carrying into pressure or through positioning and early passes.
What system does Miranchukโs role create?
With Miranchuk as the primary outlet, the ball returns centrally in each phase before the next action. Attacks build through short passes, with players moving around the ball instead of carrying it forward into pressure. Wide players hold their width longer, and runs begin from positions that receive the next pass rather than initiating the attack themselves. The sequence develops through the center before expanding outward again.
In moments where possession slows, the ball comes back to the same player to restart the next phase. Teammates adjust around that touch, and the shape of the attack forms from that central position.

Those sequences match the pattern he describes. The ball moves through short connections, players rotate around it, and the next action follows from the central pass. That approach requires the attack to pass through the same player as each phase develops.
Are players responding to him in a way that supports giving him the armband?
When Atlanta builds through midfield, players look centrally when the next pass is unclear. The ball returns to Miranchuk instead of continuing into pressure.
Runs ahead of the ball match his passing angles. Forwards hold their position until he receives, then move as the pass leaves his foot. Behind the play, the team stays connected as attacks develop. Midfielders hold their spacing, and the back line remains set as the next phase begins.
This can be seen across matches. The ball moves through him when possession stalls, and the next action follows from that touch. Teammates wait for that touch, then move as the sequence continues through him.
Closing Thoughts
Atlantaโs current structure runs through Miranchuk.ย The ball returns to him, and the next action develops from that touch as sequences unfold.
| Category | Before | After | What it means on the field |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shot quality | inconsistent | more consistent | Players are choosing better moments to shoot |
| Shot location | mixed | more inside box | Attacks are reaching more dangerous areas |
| Chance efficiency | uneven | more stable | Fewer attacks break down before a shot |
| Shot accuracy | higher/variable | flat or lower | Improvement is not coming from better finishing |
| Possession | higher | slightly lower | Control comes from usage, not volume |
| Results | underperforming | converting chances | More attacks are ending in goals |
The numbers match what the matches show. Attacks are more controlled, sequences are more consistent, and the team remains organized between phases.
Almirรณnโs return will offer a different path forward. The armband will signal which one Atlanta chooses. Right now, the team is already playing through Miranchuk.
Written by Eric/VIPsofAtlantaSoccer

One thousand percent