Sideline Soapbox submissions don’t necessarily reflect the opinions of Scarves and Spikes staff. You can submit your own pieces here.
by Chris Levine
In the classic 1980s film Back to the Future, a quirky high school kid named Marty McFly is accidentally sent back in time, setting off a chain of events he must correct to save himself and his family. (It’s 40 years old this fall—so, no spoilers!) The story is a timeless “what if”: how might one change in the past alter the present?
Atlanta United now finds itself in a similar reflection point.
After dismissing its third coach in less than two years and posting by far the worst season in club history, this is not where anyone expected the Five Stripes to be entering their 10th season. Especially not after the explosive success of their first two years. For the club, the “what if” moment may trace back to Tata Martino’s decision to leave after winning MLS Cup, and the alternate timeline that began when he did. While that decision may have been beyond the club’s control at the time, Atlanta United now has a chance to undo it: an opportunity to reset the club’s direction, identity, and energy.
Over the last seven seasons, Atlanta has cycled through managers dismissed for style (Frank de Boer), character (Gabriel Heinze), results (Gonzalo Pineda), and disengagement (Ronny Deila). Franchise-defining players have moved on: Miguel Almiron, Josef Martinez, Darlington Nagbe, Michael Parkhurst, Julian Gressel, and now Brad Guzan. All-star-caliber talents like Ezequiel Barco, Pity Martinez, Luiz Araujo, Franco Escobar, Thiago Almada, and Giorgos Giakoumakis have come and gone, often underperforming amid a lack of cohesion and tactical clarity. Brief flashes of hope have been drowned out by long droughts: just three playoff appearances in the last six years, and only one playoff advancement—under a popular interim coach who was later let go.
The excuses have been many: injuries, contracts, bad luck (“At least we’re getting chances”). But it’s fair to call this era post-Tata purgatory, a Sisyphean cycle of experimentation that never moves the needle.
Some will say nostalgia isn’t the answer, pointing to failed “returns” elsewhere. But in this case, nostalgia might be exactly what the team needs. This isn’t about clinging to the past; it’s about reclaiming the identity and purpose that made Atlanta United great. This is a rare chance to course-correct — not toward the unknown, but back to the very formula that built one of the most exciting franchises in MLS history.
Tata Martino is a fútbol legend (Google his résumé if you need proof). He’s won everywhere he’s gone, all while playing an energetic, expressive brand of soccer that drew fans and players alike to Atlanta. In a city then seen as a “non-fútbol market,” Tata built a championship-level roster, blending emerging young talent with proven MLS veterans. It was the perfect storm of tactical brilliance, chemistry, and fan connection, a model new franchises have tried (and mostly failed) to replicate.
We may never know every reason why the partnership ended, but what’s clear is that the magic has been missing ever since. Yes, Tata’s roster construction carried over into an Eastern Conference Final the next year, much like Jimmy Johnson’s Cowboys still won a Super Bowl under a new coach. But unless Atlanta wants a decade of frustration to stretch into a generation (looking at you, Jerry), it’s time for a mea culpa, a bit of humility to bring back the architect of its success.
Tata wants to return. Atlanta United would be foolish not to let him.

This past season marked a low point in fan engagement. The team wasn’t just losing; it was boring. The Five Stripes failed to score 13 times in 34 matches, a grim franchise record. At times, the players seemed to forget the basics of passing and finishing, frustrating supporters and pundits alike. Expectations were sky-high. This was supposed to be a contender for the Supporters’ Shield and MLS Cup, especially after humbling Messi and friends in the playoffs just a year prior. Instead, fans were left asking, “What happened?” Attendance and interest both fell sharply, something unimaginable just a year earlier.
So what now? Fans won’t be fooled again by another recycled MLS hire. The 2018 team isn’t walking through that door…or is it?
Tata Martino is uniquely qualified to rebuild this club the same way he built it the first time. He’s still got it — Inter Miami won the Supporters’ Shield just last year under his leadership. Players like Miggy thrived under his system, and with Atlanta’s Designated Players expected to remain, who better to maximize their potential than the man who first defined “Atlanta United soccer”?
This should be a no-brainer. With the world’s eyes soon turning to Atlanta ahead of the World Cup, the club faces a defining choice: resurgence or rerun?
Remember, Marty McFly got a better version of his family (and a new truck) by changing just one decision in the past. If Atlanta United makes the right choice now, an even bigger prize might be waiting in its future.
| Get Atlanta United and NWSL Atlanta training ground updates, audio and video content you won’t see anywhere else, Discord access, and more. Support us on Patreon and help support independent soccer coverage here in Atlanta! Click here to start a 7-day free trial. |

[…] Back to the future: Why Tata Martino is the best choice to save Atlanta United | Sideline Soapbox […]
AJC is reporting that the deal with Tata is being finalized and an announcement could come today!
Glad you mentioned Luis Araujo. Saw him in a friendly earlier this year, looked like a different player.
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
One thing to keep in mind thanks to Jason Longshores AST podcast. Jason pointed out if Tata returns he will be here no longer than 2-3 years. He will want to win immediately. What might that mean? We again have short term success and then possibly flame out again? I’d prefer to sustain success and not ride a constant roller coaster. Tata will win but at what future cost?
Something I posted elsewhere, just as devil’s advocate (your concerns are definitely well warranted): it’s also possible that Tata coming in, even if only for a couple years, provides a better foundation for the next long term coach to build on, as opposed to trying to build off of a spoon contender. It’s not guaranteed obviously, but there’s a decent argument to made of tweaking something good is easier than trying to turn around something incredibly bad.
Here’s hoping this FO won’t burn the whole thing to the ground like the last FO did after Tata left. If the foundation stays, the team can continue to compete into the future as long as the FO builds on it (think 2019 rather than 2020 on).
You’re inventing a cost that doesn’t exist. If Tata is able to come in for 2-3 years and get us on track with winning in short order it’s worth it. Build a new foundation of winning and attacking football. Hopefully with some hardware. Then deal with replacing Tata from a position of success.
The dropoff post-Tata was the result of a complete shift in tactical identity and missing on a lot of players the FO acquired to fit that style. Plus Josef’s knee blew out and that put us in a bigger hole. Had the FO just found another Biesla disciple or someone similar, I don’t think it would’ve turned to shit so fast.
I think we are going to know the new coach soon, so the speculation will soon be over.
Well said
well written piece chris…and i couldn’t agree more! thanks,
I’m 100% for rehiring Tata, even if he only stays two years again. I have full faith he can get us back on the right track and make us exciting to watch again.
Well written opinion piece! Good content and enjoyable to read and consider. Thanks for sharing it. You make a good case for Tata’s return to ATL UTD.
but… but… The photo is from Back to the Future Part II.
Because it’s Tata part II
Discussion starter: For the people reluctant “for the nostalgia hire”, I’m open to hearing other options. Give an alternative to Tata and an argument for why your option would be better.
I’m fine with Tata coming back. But for funzies…throw a bunch of money at Wilfred Nancy.
But if we’re all being honest… we know the only man who can save us…Dane Brekken Shae.
Fair, I would be ecstatic to get Nancy, I just don’t expect it to happen.
I confess to not knowing much about Nancy, but the descriptions of his philosophy returned by a quick Google search sound a lot like Pineda and Deila.:-/
The short of it is do you like the way Columbus Crew has played the past few years, and the success they’ve had? MLS Cup, wins in general, aggressive fast football (how many games against them in recent years have ended up with them scoring 4 or more on us again?) If yes, then you like Nancy.
My reasoning? This club needs a reset. It’s arrogant and overrates its place in the MLS hierarchy. Good fan attendance is commendable but not enough.
I’d rather see them focus again on a younger assistant coach with ambition, acknowledging that next season will be a rebuilding year. Start building a sustainable culture and identity that isn’t afraid to give young players minutes, gamble on some U22s, or sign MLS-based free agents.
But it’ll never happen because so many of the initial fans didn’t understand that the early success is built into MLS expansion dynamics. Once the team had to compete on level ground, it floundered.
Tata can certainly steer the team back to the playoffs, but the rot at the core will be exposed again soon enough.
We have tried the younger assistant coach (Pineda) and that didn’t work well at all. The downward slide created by the post-Tata managers has caused AtlUtd to go from having waiting lists for season tickets, to offering bonuses for referring people to buy season tickets. We need the reset that Tata will bring and the re-establishment of the style of football that we love.
I get the idea, but that’s not what I asked for. Show me a specific coach to get and prove to me why they will be successful, and won’t be another Heinze/Pineda/Deila.
What you describe sounds almost word for word like the Pineda era. So what next assistant coach do you think will succeed where Pineda failed and why?
“rather see them focus again on a younger assistant coach”
No offense. But no thanks!
The culture we need is a winning one. I think a more experienced coach with demonstrated ability to win games and implement a tactical identity is a much better move than hiring another “ambitious assistant” with zero experience. The culture at AUFC when Tata left was still strong. The biggest issue was making a major shift in approach by bringing in FdB. The players that made up the core of the 2018 roster that were still here in 2019 were strong enough to win despite playing much of the season in a system that didn’t really fit the best use. Things starting to crumble when those guys aged out or were shipped off or not re-signed. Then Josef’s knee blew out and he was a shell of the player that dominated the league and could’ve served as a foundation as we tried to shift gears after FdB and Heinze.
Who’s Biff in this scenario?
Don Garber.
It was a nice truck